Nào giờ chúng ta bị gạt
Page 1 of 2 • Share
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Nào giờ chúng ta bị gạt
Study Shows Nearly 64% of Bottled Water in America is Just Tap Water: Here’s the Brands
In a groundbreaking study (ref), the Environmental Working Group (EWG) tested 10 popular bottled water brands to assess their purity and safety.
The results were alarming: on average, each brand contained 8 different contaminants, ranging from caffeine and acetaminophen to fertilizers, solvents, plastic-derived chemicals, and strontium.
Two brands, Walmart’s Sam’s Choice and Giant Food’s Acadia, stood out for their particularly high levels of contamination. In fact, Sam’s Choice was found to contain contaminants exceeding California’s bottled water quality standards in some cases.
Perhaps the most surprising revelation from the EWG study is that approximately 64% of the bottled water sold in the United States is actually sourced from municipal tap water. This means that many consumers are paying a premium for water that they could easily obtain from their kitchen sink.
Major brands such as Dasani, Aquafina, and Nestle Pure Life are among those that source their water from public water supplies. In many cases, this water undergoes little to no additional treatment or filtration before being packaged and sold to consumers.
1. Water source disclosure: Does the brand disclose the geographic location of the water source on the label?
2. Purification methods: Does the brand provide information on the label about how the water was treated and purified?
3. Water quality testing: Does the brand publicly release the results of water quality tests showing what contaminants were found?
EWG found that most brands failed to provide this essential information to consumers. In 2011, only three brands earned top marks for transparency: Gerber Pure Purified Water, Nestle Pure Life Purified Water, and Penta Ultra-Purified Water.
Based on their findings, EWG made several key recommendations for both bottled water brands and consumers:
1. Bottled water companies should label the specific water sources and treatment methods for all their products.
2. Companies should provide easily accessible water quality reports disclosing all test results, list water treatment methods on the label, and provide clear, specific information on the water source and location.
In a groundbreaking study (ref), the Environmental Working Group (EWG) tested 10 popular bottled water brands to assess their purity and safety.
The results were alarming: on average, each brand contained 8 different contaminants, ranging from caffeine and acetaminophen to fertilizers, solvents, plastic-derived chemicals, and strontium.
Two brands, Walmart’s Sam’s Choice and Giant Food’s Acadia, stood out for their particularly high levels of contamination. In fact, Sam’s Choice was found to contain contaminants exceeding California’s bottled water quality standards in some cases.
Perhaps the most surprising revelation from the EWG study is that approximately 64% of the bottled water sold in the United States is actually sourced from municipal tap water. This means that many consumers are paying a premium for water that they could easily obtain from their kitchen sink.
Major brands such as Dasani, Aquafina, and Nestle Pure Life are among those that source their water from public water supplies. In many cases, this water undergoes little to no additional treatment or filtration before being packaged and sold to consumers.
[size=30]EWG’s Criteria for Evaluating Bottled Water Brands[/size]
To assess the transparency and quality of the top 10 U.S. domestic bottled water brands, EWG used three key criteria:1. Water source disclosure: Does the brand disclose the geographic location of the water source on the label?
2. Purification methods: Does the brand provide information on the label about how the water was treated and purified?
3. Water quality testing: Does the brand publicly release the results of water quality tests showing what contaminants were found?
EWG found that most brands failed to provide this essential information to consumers. In 2011, only three brands earned top marks for transparency: Gerber Pure Purified Water, Nestle Pure Life Purified Water, and Penta Ultra-Purified Water.
Based on their findings, EWG made several key recommendations for both bottled water brands and consumers:
1. Bottled water companies should label the specific water sources and treatment methods for all their products.
2. Companies should provide easily accessible water quality reports disclosing all test results, list water treatment methods on the label, and provide clear, specific information on the water source and location.
_________________
8DonCo
Re: Nào giờ chúng ta bị gạt
nói vụ nầy mới nhơ, phi trường San Francisco chắc ký contract với hãng nước 1 chai $4-5 (quên tên) gần như kím hiệu khác không có , tiệm nào cũng bán có 1,2 hiệu
_________________
8DonCo
Re: Nào giờ chúng ta bị gạt
tui toàn là uống nước ngay cái vòi nước, cũng chẵng qua filter luôn
saurieng2016
Re: Nào giờ chúng ta bị gạt
saurieng2016 wrote:tui toàn là uống nước ngay cái vòi nước, cũng chẵng qua filter luôn
It ís OK nhưng hôi mùi ống nước
_________________
8DonCo
Re: Nào giờ chúng ta bị gạt
8DonCo wrote:Major brands such as Dasani, Aquafina, and Nestle Pure Life are among those that source their water from public water supplies. In many cases, this water undergoes little to no additional treatment or filtration before being packaged and sold to consumers.
Wow, vậy thì họ lời quá trời mà 0 cần invest in any filteration systems except a tap and pay water bills thôi.
ga10
Re: Nào giờ chúng ta bị gạt
b/v tui không tin cái vụ Ò GÁ NỊT , nhiều khi họ xạo no one knows
_________________
8DonCo
Re: Nào giờ chúng ta bị gạt
chắc quen nên không thấy mùi gì? tui có thử nấu lên chờ nguội rồi uống thì tui thấy nước không nấu lên có vị ngọt hơn nên tui thích nước không nấu, nhưng thường tui hứng ra cái chai để ra bàn rồi uống chứ không có uống liền từ vòi ra, cứ hết cái chai nuớc ngoài bàn thì lại hứng vô tiếp để uống
saurieng2016
Re: Nào giờ chúng ta bị gạt
Anyway, you need this to drink tap water, mỗi vùng khác nhau, nêu dưới 200 thì OK
_________________
8DonCo
Re: Nào giờ chúng ta bị gạt
cái này mua ở đâu bác8, tui cứ nghĩ là city lo cái vụ này nên tui toàn là uống nước của vòi nước 1 cách vô tư
saurieng2016
Re: Nào giờ chúng ta bị gạt
mua ở Amazon, nhiều khu vực nước không tôt mặc dù họ có lọc rồi
_________________
8DonCo
Re: Nào giờ chúng ta bị gạt
ở Đức cũng nói nước từ leitung vòi uống được liền nhưng ldn họa hoằn mấy chục năm uống 1 lần còn thì luôn nấu sôi lên để nguội mới uống . thường thì mua nước lọc trong chai uống.
_________________
~ bài viết về Sách:
https://www.nhomcho.com/t25736-sach
Người ăn chay - Han Kang
https://www.nhomcho.com/t37281-sach-noi-nguoi-an-chay-han-kang#434073
LDN
Re: Nào giờ chúng ta bị gạt
TuTu wrote:Loc.nước trong bình co' filter ok không ?
loại nào ? loại lọc thường hay filtration system
Here my experience
Tap water : ~ 170
Sau khi lọc thường hay của tủ lạnh thì còn khoảng 130, 140
Còn qua filtration system thì dưới 10
_________________
8DonCo
Re: Nào giờ chúng ta bị gạt
8DonCo wrote:mua ở Amazon, nhiều khu vực nước không tôt mặc dù họ có lọc rồi
mà cái đồ đo đó gọi là gì bác8?
saurieng2016
Re: Nào giờ chúng ta bị gạt
Minh hoi do toi gio chi nau nuoc pha tra uong to sang toi toi... chi khi nao di gym thi dem theo phai nuoc suoi Zephryhills (local) cua Florida.
spinner
Re: Nào giờ chúng ta bị gạt
saurieng2016 wrote:8DonCo wrote:mua ở Amazon, nhiều khu vực nước không tôt mặc dù họ có lọc rồi
mà cái đồ đo đó gọi là gì bác8?
TDS Water tester
_________________
8DonCo
saurieng2016
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics
» Anh này hên quá chừng
» Chúng ta bị lừa ???
» chứng nhận tiêm chủng Covid-10 giả mạo rao bán trên Internet
» Về già, chúng ta dựa vào ai?
» Hum bữa tui nói: bọn chúng xí gạt bọn ta mờ!
» Chúng ta bị lừa ???
» chứng nhận tiêm chủng Covid-10 giả mạo rao bán trên Internet
» Về già, chúng ta dựa vào ai?
» Hum bữa tui nói: bọn chúng xí gạt bọn ta mờ!
Page 1 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum